Hi Jeff,
>> 2013-11-26 Rainer Orth
>>
>> * gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp: Append to ld_library_path.
>> Call set_ld_library_path_env_vars.
>> * g++.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp: Likewise.
> Thanks for taking care of this. You're probably getting more cilk+ fallout
> than most bec
Hi Balaji,
>> 2013-11-26 Rainer Orth
>>
>> * gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp: Append to ld_library_path.
>> Call set_ld_library_path_env_vars.
>> * g++.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp: Likewise.
>
> Thanks for catching this! Sorry I didn't catch it sooner. I am just getting
> myself f
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Orth [mailto:r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 6:39 AM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Iyer, Balaji V
> Subject: [testsuite] Properly set ld_library_path in cilk-plus tests
>
> All 64-bit gcc.dg/atomic and c-c++-co
On 11/27/13 04:39, Rainer Orth wrote:
All 64-bit gcc.dg/atomic and c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK execution tests
were FAILing on Solaris 10 and 11/x86:
ld.so.1: c11-atomic-exec-1.exe: fatal:
/var/gcc/regression/trunk/10-gcc-gas/build/./gcc/libgcc_s.so.1: wrong ELF
class: ELFCLASS32
ld.so.1: fib.e