Re: [patch][mips] split mips_reorg in pre- and post-dbr_schedule parts

2013-05-07 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 19:16 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: > >> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Graham Stott wrote: >> > Steven, >> > >> > The new execute mips_machine_reorrg2 part of the patch doesn't have a >> > return value! >> >> Right, bri

Re: [patch][mips] split mips_reorg in pre- and post-dbr_schedule parts

2013-05-07 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 19:16 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Graham Stott wrote: > > Steven, > > > > The new execute mips_machine_reorrg2 part of the patch doesn't have a > > return value! > > Right, brilliant... Thanks for spotting that. > > Steve, can you try

Re: [patch][mips] split mips_reorg in pre- and post-dbr_schedule parts

2013-05-07 Thread Graham Stott
Steven, The new execute mips_machine_reorrg2 part of the patch  doesn't have a return value! Graham

Re: [patch][mips] split mips_reorg in pre- and post-dbr_schedule parts

2013-05-07 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > Yes, I did two builds, one with the git version just before this checkin > and one with the checkin. This is the patch I am refering to, it > doesn't seem VR4130 specific. On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Graham Stott wrote: > Steven, > > The

Re: [patch][mips] split mips_reorg in pre- and post-dbr_schedule parts

2013-05-07 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 18:39 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: > Yes, I did two builds, one with the git version just before this checkin > and one with the checkin. This is the patch I am refering to, it > doesn't seem VR4130 specific. Hmm, I can'

Re: [patch][mips] split mips_reorg in pre- and post-dbr_schedule parts

2013-05-07 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 18:39 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > > > Steven, > > > > This patch has broken the GCC build for my mips-mti-linux-gnu and > > mips-mti-elf builds. The GCC build dies > > when trying to configure libgcc. Do you have a

Re: [patch][mips] split mips_reorg in pre- and post-dbr_schedule parts

2013-05-07 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > Steven, > > This patch has broken the GCC build for my mips-mti-linux-gnu and > mips-mti-elf builds. The GCC build dies > when trying to configure libgcc. Do you have any idea what might be going on? Hello, Are you sure this is caused by

RE: [patch][mips] split mips_reorg in pre- and post-dbr_schedule parts

2013-05-07 Thread Steve Ellcey
Steven, This patch has broken the GCC build for my mips-mti-linux-gnu and mips-mti-elf builds. The GCC build dies when trying to configure libgcc. Do you have any idea what might be going on? Steve Ellcey sell...@imgtec.com checking for mips-mti-linux-gnu-gcc... /local/home/sellcey/nightly

Re: [patch][mips] split mips_reorg in pre- and post-dbr_schedule parts

2013-04-23 Thread Richard Sandiford
Steven Bosscher writes: > *ping* MIPS maintainers... Patch is OK. Sorry for the slow review, been on holiday. Richard

Re: [patch][mips] split mips_reorg in pre- and post-dbr_schedule parts

2013-04-20 Thread Steven Bosscher
*ping* MIPS maintainers... On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 04/14/2013 08:20 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> This patch splits mips_reorg.c in a pre-dbr_schedule part and a new, >> machine specific post-dbr_schedule pass. With this patch, >> cleanup_barriers and

Re: [patch][mips] split mips_reorg in pre- and post-dbr_schedule parts

2013-04-15 Thread Jeff Law
On 04/14/2013 08:20 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote: Hello, This patch splits mips_reorg.c in a pre-dbr_schedule part and a new, machine specific post-dbr_schedule pass. With this patch, cleanup_barriers and dbr_schedule can be static functions again. Cross-built&tested mips-sim. OK for trunk? Ciao!