On 06/28/2018 01:16 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
>>> --- i386.md (revision 259756)
>>> +++ i386.md (working copy)
>>> @@ -3547,7 +3547,7 @@
>>> {
>>> case MODE_DF:
>>>if (TARGET_AVX && REG_P (operands[0]) && REG_P (operands[1]))
>>> -return "vmovsd\t{%1, %0, %0|%0, %0, %1}";
>>> +
On 06/28/2018 01:16 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
>>> --- i386.md (revision 259756)
>>> +++ i386.md (working copy)
>>> @@ -3547,7 +3547,7 @@
>>> {
>>> case MODE_DF:
>>>if (TARGET_AVX && REG_P (operands[0]) && REG_P (operands[1]))
>>> -return "vmovsd\t{%1, %0, %0|%0, %0, %1}";
>>> +
Hello!
> So what I'm confused about is in the original output template operand
> 0 is duplicated. In the new template operand 1 is duplicated.
>
> Presumably what you're trying to accomplish is avoiding a false read
> on operand 0 (the destination)? Can you please confirm?
> Knowing that shoul
Hello!
>> --- i386.md (revision 259756)
>> +++ i386.md (working copy)
>> @@ -3547,7 +3547,7 @@
>> {
>> case MODE_DF:
>>if (TARGET_AVX && REG_P (operands[0]) && REG_P (operands[1]))
>> -return "vmovsd\t{%1, %0, %0|%0, %0, %1}";
>> +return "%vmovsd\t{%d1, %0|%0, %d1}";
>>return "
On 05/02/2018 03:55 AM, Nesterovskiy, Alexander wrote:
> This patch fixes false dependencies for vmovss, vmovsd, vrcpss, vrsqrtss,
> vsqrtss and vsqrtsd instructions.
>
> Tested on x86-64/Linux, no new test fails, some SPEC 2006/2017 performance
> gains.
> Please let me know if something is wron
> This patch fixes false dependencies for vmovss, vmovsd, vrcpss, vrsqrtss,
> vsqrtss and vsqrtsd
> instructions.
>
> Tested on x86-64/Linux, no new test fails, some SPEC 2006/2017 performance
> gains.
> Please let me know if something is wrong here and should be changed.
Your submission needs a
