Re: [patch, arm] align saved FP regs on stack

2015-05-06 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > On ARM targets, the stack is aligned to an 8-byte boundary, but when > saving/restoring the VFP coprocessor registers in the function > prologue/epilogue, it is possible for the 8-byte values to end up at > locations that are 4-byte align

Re: [ping**2] Re: [patch, arm] align saved FP regs on stack

2015-01-08 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 12/17/2014 03:18 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: On 11/14/2014 05:46 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: 2014-11-14 Sandra Loosemore Joshua Conner Chris Jones gcc/ * doc/invoke.texi (Option Summary): Add -malign-saved-fp-regs. (ARM options): Document it. * config/

[ping] Re: [patch, arm] align saved FP regs on stack

2014-12-17 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 11/14/2014 05:46 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: 2014-11-14 Sandra Loosemore Joshua Conner Chris Jones gcc/ * doc/invoke.texi (Option Summary): Add -malign-saved-fp-regs. (ARM options): Document it. * config/arm/arm.h (arm_stack_offs

RE: [patch, arm] align saved FP regs on stack

2014-11-26 Thread Evandro Menezes
Hi, Sandra. FWIW, I tried this patch on A15 Juno with Coremark and any difference, if any, between specifying this option and not was below 1%. Cheers, -- Evandro Menezes Austin, TX > -Original Message- > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patc