> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener
> Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025 03:19
> To: Robert Dubner
> Cc: Sam James ; GCC Patches ;
> Richard Biener
> Subject: Re: [committed] cobol: Eliminate cobolworx UAT errors when
> compiling with -Os
>
> On Fri,
ag_strict_aliasing modification.
>
> Thanks for asking, and thanks for listening.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Robert Dubner
> > Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 16:02
> > To: Sam James
> > Cc: GCC Patches
> > Subject: RE: [committed
ghtened out, everything is working without
> the flag_strict_aliasing modification.
>
> Thanks for asking, and thanks for listening.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Robert Dubner
>> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 16:02
>> To: Sam James
>> Cc: GCC Patches
&g
Nice that you have that covered, and thanks for sharing your way there.
I just want to offer an additional thing to consider: different
environments have a different byte-size for the return code (most common
on COBOL for PC is 4, but 2 and 8 also exist).
Micro Focus COBOL and GnuCOBOL have a
t: Friday, April 4, 2025 16:02
> To: Sam James
> Cc: GCC Patches
> Subject: RE: [committed] cobol: Eliminate cobolworx UAT errors when
> compiling with -Os
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sam James <mailto:s...@gentoo.org>
> > Sent: Friday, April
> -Original Message-
> From: Sam James <mailto:s...@gentoo.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 4, 2025 14:28
> To: Robert Dubner <mailto:rdub...@symas.com>
> Cc: 'GCC Patches' <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
> Subject: Re: [committed] cobol: Eliminate
Robert Dubner writes:
> From e70fe5ed46ab129a8b1da961c47d3fb75b11b988 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Bob Dubner mailto:rdub...@symas.com
> Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 13:48:58 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] cobol: Eliminate cobolworx UAT errors when compiling with
> -Os
>
> Testcases compiled with -Os were
