Hello,
> >
> > Hm, the testcase looks like it should actually pass even for strict-
> align
> > targets. Martin?
> >
>
> Well, tree_non_mode_aligned_mem_p clearly does not really work very
> well and needs a more-or-less reimplementation, there has been a
> discussion about this already in Augus
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Terry Guo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The SRA optimization requires the reference to struct/union member must be
> > aligned to their natural boundary e.g. (int *) must be aligned to 4 byte
> > b
Hello,
>
> Hm, the testcase looks like it should actually pass even for strict-
> align
> targets. Martin?
>
> Richard.
>
I debugged the GCC and observed the below situation. Here is the code
snippet of this case:
static int
__attribute__((noinline))
ox (struct bovid *cow)
{
cow->red = cow
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Terry Guo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The SRA optimization requires the reference to struct/union member must be
> aligned to their natural boundary e.g. (int *) must be aligned to 4 byte
> boundary. This is done in function tree_non_mode_aligned_mem_p. For target
> like x8
