Hi,
Thanks for your quick reply.
>> I think you should use altivec_lvx_v4si_2op_si instead?
I will look into this. I had used v4si_internal as this was generated in older
versions (> And the same needs to be done for v8hi, v16qi, v4sf, maybe more?
I did observe some other testcase failures for 32-
Hi!
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 12:26:41PM +, Kaushik Phatak wrote:
> --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c(revision 256400)
> +++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c(working copy)
> @@ -15799,8 +15799,10 @@
> exp, target, false);
> case ALTIVEC_BUILTIN_L
