On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 4:14 PM David Malcolm wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2024-02-28 at 08:58 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:20 PM Robert Dubner
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Richard,
> > >
> > > Thank you very much for your comments.
> > >
> > > When I set out to create the capabili
On Wed, 2024-02-28 at 08:58 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 10:20 PM Robert Dubner
> wrote:
> >
> > Richard,
> >
> > Thank you very much for your comments.
> >
> > When I set out to create the capability, I had a "specification" in
> > mind.
> >
> > I didn't have a clue
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 9:25 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 08:58:08AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Incidentially this looks like something fit for a google summer of code
> > project.
> > Ideally it would hook into print-tree.cc providing an alternate
> > structured outp
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 08:58:08AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> Incidentially this looks like something fit for a google summer of code
> project.
> Ideally it would hook into print-tree.cc providing an alternate
> structured output.
> It currently prints in the style
>
> type ty
enance is also
the reason to not simply accept your contribution as-is.
I do hope this eventually gets picked up. I've added a project idea
to https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/SummerOfCode
and would be willing to mentor it.
Oh, and I'm looking forward to the actual Cobol work!
Thanks,
Rich
e better.
-Original Message-----
From: Richard Biener
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2024 04:11
To: Robert Dubner
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] developer option: -fdump-generic-nodes; initial
incorporation
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 5:46 PM Robert Dubner wrote:
>
> As part of
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 5:46 PM Robert Dubner wrote:
>
> As part of an effort to learn how create a GENERIC tree in order to
> implement a
> COBOL front end, I created the dump_generic_nodes(), which accepts a
> function_decl at the point it is provided to the middle end. The routine
> generates
