On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 03:26:45PM -0500, Robert Dubner wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jakub Jelinek
> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 16:05
> > To: Iain Sandoe
> > Cc: Robert Dubner ; GCC Patches > patc...@gcc.gnu.org>
> >
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 09:50:53PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Change-Logs.html
> contains some of the reasons and something about the formatting etc.
> When you repeat the same description over and over, normally one just writes
> * cdf.y: Modif
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 17:04
> To: Robert Dubner ; Iain Sandoe
> ; GCC Patches
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cobol: Eliminate CPPFLAGS assignment from Make-
> lang.in [PR119213].
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 09:5
On Mär 17 2025, Robert Dubner wrote:
> I did it, reflexively, because I think that lining stuff like that up iss
> easier to understand and more clear than.
>
> PR cobol/119213
> * Make-lang.in: Eliminate CPPFLAGS= assignment.
> * cdf.y: Modify #includes that reference libgcobol.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 16:05
> To: Iain Sandoe
> Cc: Robert Dubner ; GCC Patches patc...@gcc.gnu.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cobol: Eliminate CPPFLAGS assignment from Make-
> lang.in [PR119213].
>
>
Hello Robert,
> On 17 Mar 2025, at 17:45, Robert Dubner wrote:
>
> If this is deemed OK, then we can close out PR119213
>
> It compiles and runs my both check-cobol and my more comprehensive
> tests on x86_64
This looks a reasonable approach to me; it has the advantage of making the
shared h
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 07:57:43PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> > PR cobol/119213
> > * Make-lang.in: Eliminate CPPFLAGS= assignment.
> > * cdf.y: Modify #includes that reference libgcobol.
> > * cobol1.cc: Modify #includes that reference libgcobol.
> > * except.c
