x27; ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] RX pragma address
Hi Oleg,
Thank you very much for those suggestions, they are definitely the better way
to go.
>From my point of view I would like drop both patches(RX and RL78) however I
>contacted the AP4 tool team to see if they agree with
ot I will follow your suggestion and move it out from the M32C target and
make it available for every target.
Best Regards,
Sebastian
-Original Message-
From: Oleg Endo [mailto:oleg.e...@t-online.de]
Sent: 05 January 2018 12:50
To: Sebastian Perta ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [
On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 12:12 +, Sebastian Perta wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Is this for some kind of legacy backwards compatibility of
> > > something?
> Sort of, this is required by the following tool
> https://www.renesas.com/en-eu/products/software-tools/tools/code-
> generator/ap4-application-le
-
From: Oleg Endo [mailto:oleg.e...@t-online.de]
Sent: 05 January 2018 11:59
To: Sebastian Perta ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RX pragma address
Hi,
On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 11:03 +, Sebastian Perta wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The following patch adds a new pragma, "pragma ad
Hi,
On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 11:03 +, Sebastian Perta wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The following patch adds a new pragma, "pragma address" for RX.
> The patch updates extend.texi and add a test case to the regression
> as well.
> For the test case I checked than test is getting picked up in gcc.log
>
Sorry the spaces got removed from previous email.
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Perta
Sent: 05 January 2018 10:59
To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
Subject: [PATCH] RX pragma address
Hello,
The following patch adds a new pragma, "pragma address" for RX.
The patch updates extend.texi
