> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Bennett [mailto:andrew.benn...@imgtec.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11:17 AM
> To: Moore, Catherine; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Matthew Fortune
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] MIPS: fix failing branch range checks for micromips
> > testsuite/
> > * gcc.target/mips/branch-2.c: Change NOMIPS16 to
> > NOCOMPRESSION.
> > * gcc.target/mips/branch-3.c: Ditto
> > * gcc.target/mips/branch-4.c: Ditto.
> > * gcc.target/mips/branch-5.c: Ditto.
> > * gcc.target/mips/branch-6.c: Ditto.
> > * gcc.target/mips/bra
Hi Andrew,
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Bennett [mailto:andrew.benn...@imgtec.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 12:13 PM
> To: Moore, Catherine; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Matthew Fortune
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] MIPS: fix failing branch range checks for micro
> I see that you are naming these tests after the original branch- tests
> that they were derived from.
> I think it would be better to keep all of the microMIPS tests named umips-???.
> I don't think preserving the original number is important.
I have named the microMIPS tests umips-branch-??? to
Hi Andrew,
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Bennett
> Sent: Friday, July 03, 2015 7:50 PM
> Subject: [PATCH] MIPS: fix failing branch range checks for micromips
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.targe
> There is a follow-up patch that I will be working on that will correctly
> update the other
> branch tests to correctly test out of range branch behaviour for
> micromips. Currently these
> are passing because the mips branch range offset is large enough. These
> offsets will
> need to be reduc
