> -Original Message-
> From: Bernd Edlinger
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 4:56 PM
> To: Tamar Christina ; Michael Matz
>
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Biener
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generate gimple-match.c and generic-match.c earlier
>
> On 7/14/
> Tamar
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Gcc-patches On Behalf Of
>> Michael Matz
>> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 4:33 PM
>> To: Bernd Edlinger
>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Biener
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generate gimple-match.c and
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Biener
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2021 2:19 PM
> To: Tamar Christina
> Cc: Michael Matz ; Bernd Edlinger
> ; Richard Biener ; gcc-
> patc...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generate gimple-match.c and generic-match.c ear
reflected in above dependences. Not sure how to fix
> that though.
I guess add
dependencies = { module=all-gcc; on=all-libcpp; };
like it is done for libiberty.
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > Tamar
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > >
e dependences. Not sure how to fix
that though.
> > Kind Regards,
> > Tamar
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Gcc-patches On Behalf Of
> > > Michael Matz
> > > Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 4:33 PM
> > > To: Bernd Edlinger
>
d Regards,
> Tamar
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gcc-patches On Behalf Of
> > Michael Matz
> > Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 4:33 PM
> > To: Bernd Edlinger
> > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Biener
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generate gimple-m
chael Matz
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 4:33 PM
> To: Bernd Edlinger
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Biener
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generate gimple-match.c and generic-match.c earlier
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 28 May 2021, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
> > >>
Hello,
On Fri, 28 May 2021, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> >> I was wondering, why gimple-match.c and generic-match.c
> >> are not built early but always last, which slows down parallel
> >> makes significantly.
> >>
> >> The reason seems to be that generated_files does not
> >> mention gimple-match.c a
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 09:33:14AM +0200, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> > This should help for what I was complaining about in
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2021-May/235963.html . I build with
> > -j24 and it was stalling on compiling gimple-match.c for me.
> > Looks like insn-attrtab.c is missed
On 5/28/21 9:26 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 10:10 PM Bernd Edlinger
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering, why gimple-match.c and generic-match.c
>> are not built early but always last, which slows down parallel
>> makes significantly.
>>
>> The reason seems to be that ge
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 10:10 PM Bernd Edlinger
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering, why gimple-match.c and generic-match.c
> are not built early but always last, which slows down parallel
> makes significantly.
>
> The reason seems to be that generated_files does not
> mention gimple-match.c and g
On 5/28/21 8:41 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 28 May 2021, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 5/28/21 6:42 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was wondering, why gimple-match.c and generic-match.c
>>> are not built early but always last, which slows down parallel
>>> makes significa
On Fri, 28 May 2021, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>
>
> On 5/28/21 6:42 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering, why gimple-match.c and generic-match.c
> > are not built early but always last, which slows down parallel
> > makes significantly.
> >
> > The reason seems to be that gen
On 5/28/21 6:42 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering, why gimple-match.c and generic-match.c
> are not built early but always last, which slows down parallel
> makes significantly.
>
> The reason seems to be that generated_files does not
> mention gimple-match.c and generic-match
14 matches
Mail list logo
