On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> This worked for me and I checked it in. Gerald, please let me know if
> you still have issues.
Thanks Balaji and H.J. -- my tester successfully bootstrapped
again (for the first time this month).
Gerald
> -Original Message-
> From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.to...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:30 AM
> To: Gerald Pfeifer
> Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; Jeff Law; GCC Patches
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR bootstrap/58951
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:16 AM,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
>>> Are you linking with -nostdlib or something similar? IIRC those
>>> routines are provided by libc on *bsd*. On other systems you may need
>>> to link in libdl via -ldl.
>> Yes, I am. In my sys
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
>> Are you linking with -nostdlib or something similar? IIRC those
>> routines are provided by libc on *bsd*. On other systems you may need
>> to link in libdl via -ldl.
> Yes, I am. In my system SUSE, I need to explicitly link it.
>> I'm sure there's
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Law
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 11:40 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V; Gerald Pfeifer
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix f
On 11/11/13 21:30, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Pfeifer [mailto:ger...@pfeifer.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 6:52 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR bootstrap/58951
Hi Balaji,
any chance to get this fixed
> -Original Message-
> From: Gerald Pfeifer [mailto:ger...@pfeifer.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 6:52 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR bootstrap/58951
>
> Hi Balaji,
>
> any chance to get thi
Hi Balaji,
any chance to get this fixed? Bootstrap on FreeBSD has now been
broken for some two weeks overall and I hope there aren't other
things hidden behind this one.
Gerald
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> thanks for looking into this. Unfortunately, with SVN revision 204424
> (
Hi Balaji,
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> Attached, please find a patch to fix PR 58951. The usage of -ldl is not
> necessary. The patch is tested in x86_64 and x86. It is committed as
> obvious.
thanks for looking into this. Unfortunately, with SVN revision 204424
(that is, after
