On 1 May 2013, at 21:12, "Ian Bolton" wrote:
>> Can we have the patch attached ?
>
> OK
>
OK
/Marcus
> Can we have the patch attached ?
OK
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/bics_1.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/bics_1.c (revision 0)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/bics_1.c (revision 0)
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/*
On 01/05/13 18:45, Ian Bolton wrote:
From: Marcus Shawcroft [mailto:marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com]
+ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bics\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, x\[0-
9\]+" } } */
+ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bics\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+,
x\[0-9\]+, lsl 3" } } */
Ian, These two patterns have
> From: Marcus Shawcroft [mailto:marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com]
> + /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bics\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, x\[0-
> 9\]+" } } */
>
> + /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bics\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+,
> x\[0-9\]+, lsl 3" } } */
>
> Ian, These two patterns have the same issue Richard
+ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bics\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+" } } */
+ /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bics\tx\[0-9\]+, x\[0-9\]+,
x\[0-9\]+, lsl 3" } } */
Ian, These two patterns have the same issue Richard just highlighted
on your other patch, ie the first pattern will also match a
