> On 04/04/16 11:13, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> > On 04/01/16 18:08, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> >> Evandro Menezes wrote:
> >>> I hope that this gets in the ballpark of what's been discussed
> >>> previously.
> >> Yes that's very close to what I had in mind. A minor issue is that
> >> the vector modes c
On 04/04/16 11:13, Evandro Menezes wrote:
On 04/01/16 18:08, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Evandro Menezes wrote:
I hope that this gets in the ballpark of what's been discussed
previously.
Yes that's very close to what I had in mind. A minor issue is that
the vector
modes cannot work as they start at
On 04/01/16 18:08, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Evandro Menezes wrote:
I hope that this gets in the ballpark of what's been discussed previously.
Yes that's very close to what I had in mind. A minor issue is that the vector
modes cannot work as they start at MAX_MODE_FLOAT (which is > 32):
+/* Contro
Evandro Menezes wrote:
>
> I hope that this gets in the ballpark of what's been discussed previously.
Yes that's very close to what I had in mind. A minor issue is that the vector
modes cannot work as they start at MAX_MODE_FLOAT (which is > 32):
+/* Control approximate alternatives to certain F
[AArch64] Add more choices for the reciprocal square root
approximation
Allow a target to prefer such operation depending on the
operation mode.
gcc/
* config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h
(AARCH64_APPROX_MODE): New macro.
(AARCH64_APP
