On 6/26/22 11:38, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Thanks for pushing this.
The patch triggered a (known) regression on
g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C. In the original submission I
mentioned I would XFAIL it, but forgot to do so. I have pushed the
attached patch.
Note that since this was the last us
On 6/26/2022 9:38 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Thanks for pushing this.
The patch triggered a (known) regression on
g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C. In the original submission I
mentioned I would XFAIL it, but forgot to do so. I have pushed the
attached patch.
We both forgot about this :-)
Thanks for pushing this.
The patch triggered a (known) regression on
g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C. In the original submission I
mentioned I would XFAIL it, but forgot to do so. I have pushed the
attached patch.
Note that since this was the last user of EVRP, I think it is now safe
to remo
This is 99.99% Aldy's work. My only real contribution was twiddling one
MIPS specific test in response to a regression after adding this patch
to my tester.
In simplest terms, this patch converts DOM to use the Ranger
infrastructure rather than the EVRP infrastructure. I'd basically
approve
