Hi!
Ping.
Grüße
Thomas
On 2022-05-13T14:29:01+0200, I wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2022-04-29T15:48:03+0200, I wrote:
>> On 2022-04-06T11:57:57+0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>> On 4/5/22 17:14, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Regarding [...]
>
Now, consider doing a GCC/nvptx offloading build with
Hi!
On 2022-04-29T15:48:03+0200, I wrote:
> On 2022-04-06T11:57:57+0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> On 4/5/22 17:14, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>>> Regarding [...]
>>> Now, consider doing a GCC/nvptx offloading build with
>>> '--with-cuda-driver' [...]
>> Thanks for reminding me, I forgot about this co
Hi Roger!
On 2022-04-05T19:46:08+0100, "Roger Sayle" wrote:
> I apologise that it might complicate things
No worries; that's why I asked. :-)
> one potential benefit of --with-cuda-driver
> (i.e. linking the compiler against proprietary libraries) is that it would
> allow support for
> -march
Hi Tom!
On 2022-04-06T11:57:57+0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 4/5/22 17:14, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> Regarding the following:
>>
>> On 2022-03-30T14:27:41+0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>> The -mptx flag has been added to specify the PTX ISA
>>> version
>>> for the generated code; perm
On 4/5/22 17:14, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi!
Still catching up with GCC/nvptx back end changes... %-)
In the following I'm not discussing the patch to document
"gcc-12: Nvptx updates", but rather one aspect of the
"gcc-12: Nvptx updates" themselves. ;-)
On 2022-03-30T14:27:41+0200, Tom de Vr
16:14
> To: Tom de Vries ; Jakub Jelinek
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Tobias Burnus ;
> Roger Sayle
> Subject: Proposal to remove '--with-cuda-driver' (was: [wwwdocs][patch] gcc-
> 12: Nvptx updates)
>
> Hi!
>
> Still catching up with GCC/nvptx b
Hi!
Still catching up with GCC/nvptx back end changes... %-)
In the following I'm not discussing the patch to document
"gcc-12: Nvptx updates", but rather one aspect of the
"gcc-12: Nvptx updates" themselves. ;-)
On 2022-03-30T14:27:41+0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> + The -march flag has been
