On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
> BTW, I really want to change our current scheme of merging sanitizer
> sources to gcc --
> to use 'svn external' or some such instead of maintaining a copy.
I believe we should avoid all use of systems such as svn externals or git
submodules, so
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> Hi Konstantin,
>
>> All contributions to libsanitizer should go via LLVM repository.
>> See https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/HowToContribute
>> The smaller the patches the faster they will come through.
>
> ok. I'll see how to
Hi Konstantin,
> All contributions to libsanitizer should go via LLVM repository.
> See https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/HowToContribute
> The smaller the patches the faster they will come through.
ok. I'll see how to split up the patches. Some parts are completely
trivial in th
Hi Rainer,
All contributions to libsanitizer should go via LLVM repository.
See https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/wiki/HowToContribute
The smaller the patches the faster they will come through.
If you can set up a public build bot it will *immensely* simplify many things.
(see more below
