Re: Ping #2: [Patch,AVR] Light-weight DImode implementation.

2011/12/15 Georg-Johann Lay : > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00471.html > > Georg-Johann Lay wrote: >> Georg-Johann Lay wrote: >>> Denis Chertykov wrote: >>> >>> The only question that remains is what the -m64 option should be like? >>> >>> [ ] Omit it altogether >>>

Re: Ping #2: [Patch,AVR] Light-weight DImode implementation.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00471.html Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > Georg-Johann Lay wrote: >> Denis Chertykov wrote: >> >> The only question that remains is what the -m64 option should be like? >> >> [ ] Omit it altogether >> [ ] Leave it as is (off per default)