Re: Ping^^: [PATCH V2] extract DF/SF/SI/HI/QI subreg from parameter word on stack

Hi, Jeff Law writes: > On 5/10/23 19:20, Jiufu Guo wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I would like to ping: >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609396.html >> >> We know there are a few issues related to aggregate parameter and >> returns. I'm thinking if it is ok for trunk to use t

Re: Ping^^: [PATCH V2] extract DF/SF/SI/HI/QI subreg from parameter word on stack

On 5/10/23 19:20, Jiufu Guo wrote: Hi, I would like to ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609396.html We know there are a few issues related to aggregate parameter and returns. I'm thinking if it is ok for trunk to use this patch to resolve part of those issues. I

Ping^^: [PATCH V2] extract DF/SF/SI/HI/QI subreg from parameter word on stack

Hi, I would like to ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609396.html We know there are a few issues related to aggregate parameter and returns. I'm thinking if it is ok for trunk to use this patch to resolve part of those issues. BR, Jeff (Jiufu) Jiufu Guo via Gcc-p

Ping: [PATCH V2] extract DF/SF/SI/HI/QI subreg from parameter word on stack

Hi, Gentle ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609396.html Thanks for comments and suggestions! I'm thinking that we may use these patches to fix some of the issues on parm and returns. Sorry for the late ping for this patch to ask if this is acceptable. BR, Jeff (Jiu