On 2/2/25 11:09 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Hi,
I sent https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-February/061670.html
to gcc-patches also, as normal, but got back an e-mail that it
was too large. and that a moderator would look at it.
Maybe the limits can be increased a bit, sometimes patches
On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 10:55:10AM +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 10:27, Marc Poulhiès wrote:
> >
> > I usually look at the queue a few times a day (working day)... So at least
> > in my case, I may not be very active during the weekends (even less so this
> > weeke
On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 10:27, Marc Poulhiès wrote:
>
> I usually look at the queue a few times a day (working day)... So at least in
> my case, I may not be very active during the weekends (even less so this
> weekend)...
> As for unlocking too-big patches, I happen to accept the ones that are
>
February 3, 2025 at 11:02 AM, "Mark Wielaard" mailto:m...@klomp.org?to=%22Mark%20Wielaard%22%20%3Cmark%40klomp.org%3E > wrote:
> > (Does anybody actually look at the messages, as promised in the e-mail?=
> >
> I think it is done multiple times each day. The current moderators are
> Jeff and Marc,
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 07:09:14PM +0100, Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote:
> I sent https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-February/061670.html
> to gcc-patches also, as normal, but got back an e-mail that it
> was too large. and that a moderator would look at it.
I think that was done
On Feb 02 2025, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> I sent https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-February/061670.html
> to gcc-patches also, as normal, but got back an e-mail that it
> was too large. and that a moderator would look at it.
The mail has been accepted anyway:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/g
On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 9:55 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 2 Feb 2025, 18:10 Thomas Koenig via Gcc, wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I sent https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-February/061670.html
>> to gcc-patches also, as normal, but got back an e-mail that it
>> was too large. and that
On Sun, 2 Feb 2025, 18:10 Thomas Koenig via Gcc, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I sent https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-February/061670.html
> to gcc-patches also, as normal, but got back an e-mail that it
> was too large. and that a moderator would look at it.
>
> Maybe the limits can be increased a
Hi,
I sent https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-February/061670.html
to gcc-patches also, as normal, but got back an e-mail that it
was too large. and that a moderator would look at it.
Maybe the limits can be increased a bit, sometimes patches can
be quite large, especially if they contai
