On 11/28/2017 11:00 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Jeff Law writes:
>>
>> I so wish PUSH_ROUNDING wasn't needed and that folks could at least keep
>> their processors consistent (I'm looking at the coldfire designers :(.
>> For a tale of woe, see BZ68467.
Jeff Law writes:
> On 10/23/2017 11:37 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> PUSH_ROUNDING is difficult to convert to a hook since there is still
>> a lot of conditional code based on it. It isn't clear that a direct
>> conversion with checks for null hooks is the right thing
On 10/23/2017 11:37 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> PUSH_ROUNDING is difficult to convert to a hook since there is still
> a lot of conditional code based on it. It isn't clear that a direct
> conversion with checks for null hooks is the right thing to do.
>
> Rather than
PUSH_ROUNDING is difficult to convert to a hook since there is still
a lot of conditional code based on it. It isn't clear that a direct
conversion with checks for null hooks is the right thing to do.
Rather than untangle that, this patch converts all implementations
that do something to o
