Re: PR88346, Inconsistent list of CPUs supported by the rs6000 backend after r266502

2018-12-11 Thread David Edelsohn
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 6:17 PM Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > Hi Alan, > > Let's ask David? (Cc:ed). Strange that no one noticed powerpc64 before; > titan and rs64 aren't so strange though ;-) The patch is okay with me. Thanks for catching the renaming and the processor missing from the list. I

Re: PR88346, Inconsistent list of CPUs supported by the rs6000 backend after r266502

2018-12-10 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi Alan, Let's ask David? (Cc:ed). Strange that no one noticed powerpc64 before; titan and rs64 aren't so strange though ;-) Segher On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 09:00:39PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > This patch removes the %e error for AIX, since it seems there has been > no attempt to keep ASM_CP

PR88346, Inconsistent list of CPUs supported by the rs6000 backend after r266502

2018-12-07 Thread Alan Modra
This patch removes the %e error for AIX, since it seems there has been no attempt to keep ASM_CPU_SPEC cpu support up to date for AIX, and adds missing entries to ASM_CPU_SPEC in rs6000.h. Removing the %e isn't ideal, but leaving it in and hitting a compiler error for -mcpu cases where the AIX ass