On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> wi::add_large and wi::sub_large weren't setting the overflow bit
> correctly for unsigned operations if the result needed fewer HWIs
> than the precision.
>
> Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu, x86_64-linux-gnu and powerpc64le-linux-gnu.
> OK
wi::add_large and wi::sub_large weren't setting the overflow bit
correctly for unsigned operations if the result needed fewer HWIs
than the precision.
Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu, x86_64-linux-gnu and powerpc64le-linux-gnu.
OK to install?
Richard
2017-11-21 Richard Sandiford
gcc/
PR