Mike Stump wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, "Ulrich Weigand" wrote:
> > Huh, it seems the test in this form assumes the assembler supports /* ...
> > */
> > comments. But this isn't really necessary for the test to work; I think the
> > best fix would be to just remove the comment and simp
On Nov 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, "Ulrich Weigand" wrote:
> David Edelsohn wrote:
>> I noticed that gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c fails on AIX because it
>> generates invalid assembly language:
>>
>> # 12 "/farm/dje/src/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c" 1
>>/* 0(6) 0(7) 0(8)
David Edelsohn wrote:
> I noticed that gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c fails on AIX because it
> generates invalid assembly language:
>
> # 12 "/farm/dje/src/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c" 1
> /* 0(6) 0(7) 0(8) 0(9) 0(10) */
> # 0 "" 2
>
> I'm confused why
>
> __
Hi, Uli and Jakub,
I noticed that gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c fails on AIX because it
generates invalid assembly language:
# 12 "/farm/dje/src/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c" 1
/* 0(6) 0(7) 0(8) 0(9) 0(10) */
# 0 "" 2
I'm confused why
__asm__ volatile ("/* %0
