Re: PING Cilk Plus failures on non-LTO targets

2013-11-12 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/11/13 21:41, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: -Original Message- From: David Edelsohn [mailto:dje@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 11:36 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: GCC Patches; Joseph S. Myers Subject: Re: PING Cilk Plus failures on non-LTO targets On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11

RE: PING Cilk Plus failures on non-LTO targets

2013-11-11 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
> -Original Message- > From: David Edelsohn [mailto:dje@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 11:36 AM > To: Iyer, Balaji V > Cc: GCC Patches; Joseph S. Myers > Subject: Re: PING Cilk Plus failures on non-LTO targets > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at

Re: PING Cilk Plus failures on non-LTO targets

2013-11-11 Thread Mike Stump
On Nov 11, 2013, at 8:35 AM, David Edelsohn wrote: > I continue to see extra Cilk Plus failures on AIX. Tests that require > LTO should check that the target supports LTO. Iyer, sprinkle /* { dg-require-effective-target lto } */ on those test cases and see if they then work ok as expected.

Re: PING Cilk Plus failures on non-LTO targets

2013-11-11 Thread David Edelsohn
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:06 AM, David Edelsohn wrote: > Balaji, > > I am seeing a large number of libcilkrts failures on AIX. These all > are of the form: > > Executing on host: /tmp/20131103/gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/20131103/gcc/ > /nasfarm/edelsohn > /src/src/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/sy