Actually, please consider this patch instead. It's the same but fixes a
mistake in ld.so pathname.
2011/6/2 Robert Millan :
> Hi,
>
> 2011/5/21 Joseph S. Myers :
>> Please send a patch against *current trunk* and CC *relevant target
>> architecture maintainers*. linux*.h headers are no longer us
Hi,
2011/5/21 Joseph S. Myers :
> Please send a patch against *current trunk* and CC *relevant target
> architecture maintainers*. linux*.h headers are no longer used on
> non-Linux targets (since my 2011-04-28 patch - on which I CC:ed you) so
> this patch version is no longer appropriate. I thi
On Sat, 21 May 2011, Robert Millan wrote:
> Please can this patch be considered? It's several months old (sent in
> Jan 2011), and it is critical to use of GCC on GNU/kFreeBSD.
Please send a patch against *current trunk* and CC *relevant target
architecture maintainers*. linux*.h headers are no
Please can this patch be considered? It's several months old (sent in
Jan 2011), and it is critical to use of GCC on GNU/kFreeBSD.
2011/1/26 Robert Millan :
> Ping!
>
> 2011/1/18 Robert Millan :
>> 2011/1/14 Robert Millan :
>>> 2011/1/12 Robert Millan :
> * The headers config/kfreebsd-gnu.h et
I advise CC:ing the relevant target maintainers on such patch submissions.
Since there is no *-kfreebsd-gnu maintainer (you might wish to volunteer
to be such), and no *-linux* maintainer for the linux*.h changes, this
means the people listed as maintainers of the i386 port.
--
Joseph S. Myer
Ping^2
2011/1/26 Robert Millan :
> Ping!
>
> 2011/1/18 Robert Millan :
>> 2011/1/14 Robert Millan :
>>> 2011/1/12 Robert Millan :
> * The headers config/kfreebsd-gnu.h etc. override
> GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER. But the 64-bit configurations
> x86_64-*-kfreebsd*-gnu and x86_64-*-knetbsd*-
