> >>
> >> This patch avoids calling varpool_node::finalize_decl on error_mark_node
> >> type decls. Does it make sense?
Yep, i guess this is fine. I wonder why error_mark_node needs to be in local
decl list? :)
honza
> >>
> >>
> >> H.J.
> >> --
> >> gcc/
> >>
> >> PR target/66810
> >>
On 10/20/2015 12:07 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:57:31PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
I don't see why the C FE would need to invoke finish_decl twice here.
[...]
So I'd rather
have the C frontend not invoke rest_of_decl_compilation on this in the
first place.
Your patch still
PING
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 9:13 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> PING
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:19 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:57:31PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 1:08 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Richard Biener
>>> > wrote
