Re: PING: Re: [patch] tag ../include/*

2014-10-13 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/13/14 11:29, Aldy Hernandez wrote: On 10/13/14 09:27, Jeff Law wrote: On 10/13/14 08:53, Aldy Hernandez wrote: PING On 10/07/14 09:37, Aldy Hernandez wrote: Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If not, could I please apply this patch? ENOPATCH jeff So

Re: PING: Re: [patch] tag ../include/*

2014-10-13 Thread Aldy Hernandez
On 10/13/14 09:27, Jeff Law wrote: On 10/13/14 08:53, Aldy Hernandez wrote: PING On 10/07/14 09:37, Aldy Hernandez wrote: Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If not, could I please apply this patch? ENOPATCH jeff Sorry, patch was in original message. Attac

Re: PING: Re: [patch] tag ../include/*

2014-10-13 Thread Jeff Law
On 10/13/14 08:53, Aldy Hernandez wrote: PING On 10/07/14 09:37, Aldy Hernandez wrote: Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If not, could I please apply this patch? ENOPATCH jeff

PING: Re: [patch] tag ../include/*

2014-10-13 Thread Aldy Hernandez
PING On 10/07/14 09:37, Aldy Hernandez wrote: Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If not, could I please apply this patch? Thanks. Aldy