Why not also -std=gnu++14?
On Mar 9, 2014, at 3:45 AM, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
>> Are they any plans to change the default language for C++?
>
> Probably problematic for compatibility reasons. But how about adding
> c++1, g++11, and c++14, and g++14 wrappers similar to c9
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> Are they any plans to change the default language for C++?
Probably problematic for compatibility reasons. But how about adding
c++1, g++11, and c++14, and g++14 wrappers similar to c99?
On Mar 7, 2014, at 8:22 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> It's looking very likely that we will have a new C++ standard this year, so
> I'm going to go ahead and add the -std=c++14 flag for 4.9; I just won't
> advertise it yet.
Are they any plans to change the default language for C++?
It's looking very likely that we will have a new C++ standard this year,
so I'm going to go ahead and add the -std=c++14 flag for 4.9; I just
won't advertise it yet.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit f966b130e3b011c6ac2169472fdf6508b5373eeb
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Wed
