On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:03 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> Here is the updated patch. I will wait for Uros's comments.
>>
>
> I attached the wrong file. Here is the updated patch.
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/bitfield3.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/bitfield3.C
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
// Cygwin and mingw3
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:12 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:57 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:56 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>>>
> -/* { dg-do compile { target { { { ! mips64 } && { ! ia64-*-* } } && { !
> spu-*-* } } } } */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target { {
On Jul 7, 2011, at 3:20 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> -/* { dg-do compile { target { { { ! mips64 } && { ! ia64-*-* } } && {
> ! spu-*-* } } } } */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target { { { { ! mips64 } && { ! ia64-*-* } } &&
> { ! spu-*-* } } && { ! { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && x32 } } } } } */
> -/* { dg-do c
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2011, at 2:12 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> Here is the updated patch. I will wait for Uros's comments.
>
> Please remove ChangeLog for lower-subreg-1.c and pr44194-1.c, as I don't
> think those files are modified anymore.
They are modified.
On Jul 7, 2011, at 2:12 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Here is the updated patch. I will wait for Uros's comments.
Please remove ChangeLog for lower-subreg-1.c and pr44194-1.c, as I don't think
those files are modified anymore.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:57 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:56 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>>
-/* { dg-do compile { target { { { ! mips64 } && { ! ia64-*-* } } && { !
spu-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-do compile { target { { { { ! mips64 } && { ! ia64-*-* } } && { !
spu-*-*
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:56 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>>> -/* { dg-do compile { target { { { ! mips64 } && { ! ia64-*-* } } && { !
>>> spu-*-* } } } } */
>>> +/* { dg-do compile { target { { { { ! mips64 } && { ! ia64-*-* } } && { !
>>> spu-*-* } } && { ! x32 } } } } */
>>
>>
>> Hum, I worry about x
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2011, at 11:26 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> -/* { dg-do compile { target { { i?86-*-* rs6000-*-* alpha*-*-* x86_64-*-* }
>> || { powerpc*-*-* && ilp32 } } } } */
>> +/* { dg-do compile { target { { i?86-*-* rs6000-*-* alpha*-*-* x86_64-*-* }
On Jul 7, 2011, at 11:26 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> -/* { dg-do compile { target { { i?86-*-* rs6000-*-* alpha*-*-* x86_64-*-* }
> || { powerpc*-*-* && ilp32 } } } } */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target { { i?86-*-* rs6000-*-* alpha*-*-* x86_64-*-* }
> || { powerpc*-*-* && ia32 } } } } */
powerpc doesn't
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2011, at 10:29 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Linux/x86-64, when we pass
>>
>> RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board='unix{-mx32}'"
>>
>> to GCC tests, we can't check lp64/ilp32 for availability of 64bit x86
>> instructions. This patch adds ia32 and
On Jul 7, 2011, at 10:29 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Linux/x86-64, when we pass
>
> RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board='unix{-mx32}'"
>
> to GCC tests, we can't check lp64/ilp32 for availability of 64bit x86
> instructions. This patch adds ia32 and x32 effetive targets. OK for
> trunk?
Ok.
Hi,
On Linux/x86-64, when we pass
RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board='unix{-mx32}'"
to GCC tests, we can't check lp64/ilp32 for availability of 64bit x86
instructions. This patch adds ia32 and x32 effetive targets. OK for
trunk?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
2011-07-07 H.J. Lu
* lib/target-support
12 matches
Mail list logo
