On 3/6/2011 2:57 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
>> It was recently pointed out to me that we still have the
>> README.QMTEST file in gcc/testsuite. That file talks about how to
>> use QMTest instead of DejaGNU to test G++
> If you were to summarize the 3 most compelling features provided, I'd
> be interes
On Mar 6, 2011, at 1:39 PM, mitch...@codesourcery.com (Mark Mitchell) wrote:
> It was recently pointed out to me that we still have the README.QMTEST
> file in gcc/testsuite. That file talks about how to use QMTest
> instead of DejaGNU to test G++
If you were to summarize the 3 most compelling fe
> It was recently pointed out to me that we still have the README.QMTEST
> file in gcc/testsuite. That file talks about how to use QMTest
> instead of DejaGNU to test G++ -- but the information there is just
> not accurate anymore. Various things have bit-rotted since the point
> at which that wa
It was recently pointed out to me that we still have the README.QMTEST
file in gcc/testsuite. That file talks about how to use QMTest
instead of DejaGNU to test G++ -- but the information there is just
not accurate anymore. Various things have bit-rotted since the point
at which that was written
