On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
> I am not sure if news.html is the best place for this.
news.html definitely is not a good place for this, cf. the comment
in that file. ;-)
> How about putting it in gcc-4.8/changes.html?
Yes, that fits.
> Does it look OK?
Index: ./gcc-4.8/changes.html
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> >
> >>
> >> Here is the patch for invoke.texi. OK to install?
> >>
> >> I will prepare a similar one for news.html.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> --
> >> H.J.
> >> ---
> >> diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> >> index
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> >
>>
>> Here is the patch for invoke.texi. OK to install?
>>
>> I will prepare a similar one for news.html.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> H.J.
>> ---
>> diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>> index 029a7ab..87e0d1c 100644
>> -
> >
>
> Here is the patch for invoke.texi. OK to install?
>
> I will prepare a similar one for news.html.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> H.J.
> ---
> diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> index 029a7ab..87e0d1c 100644
> --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> @@ -1357
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> >>> diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>> >>> index 4c5c79f..daa1f3a 100644
>> >>> --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>> >>> +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
>> >>> @@ -13521,6 +13521,12 @@ Attempt to keep the stack boundary aligned to a
> >>> diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> >>> index 4c5c79f..daa1f3a 100644
> >>> --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> >>> +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> >>> @@ -13521,6 +13521,12 @@ Attempt to keep the stack boundary aligned to a
> >>> 2 raised to @var{num}
> >>> byte boundary. If @opt
On 06/22/2012 06:46 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Ping.
>
> I have been running Linux kernel compiled with this option for
> weeks. Since -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 will only be allowed
> with -mno-sse, it will be used only with incompatible ABI. Any
> objections to this patch?
>
> Thanks.
The patch
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:13 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:53 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 7:47 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch allows -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 on x86-64 when SSE is
>>> disabled. Since this option changes ABI, I also added a
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:53 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 7:47 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch allows -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 on x86-64 when SSE is
>> disabled. Since this option changes ABI, I also added a warning for
>> -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3. OK for trun
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 7:47 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch allows -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 on x86-64 when SSE is
> disabled. Since this option changes ABI, I also added a warning for
> -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3. OK for trunk?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> H.J.
>
> PR target/5338
Hi,
This patch allows -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 on x86-64 when SSE is
disabled. Since this option changes ABI, I also added a warning for
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=3. OK for trunk?
Thanks.
H.J.
PR target/53383
* doc/invoke.texi: Add a warning for -mpreferred-stack-bou
11 matches
Mail list logo
