This patch caused a boot-strap failure as it should be -mno-sse4.2 and
not -mno-msse4.2, cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-05/msg00271.html
H.J. Lu wrote:
Here is the updated patch. It also handles FMA. OK for trunk and 4.6
if there are no regressions?
[...]
2011-05-23 H.J. Lu
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:25 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> + const char *sse4_2 = has_sse4_2 ? " -msse4.2" : " -msse4.2";
>>> + const char *sse4_1 = has_sse4_1 ? " -msse4.1" : " -msse4.1";
>>
>> Missing "no-" here on both lines.
>>
>
> Here is the updated patch. It also handles FMA. OK for t
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:10:26AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> + const char *sse4_2 = has_sse4_2 ? " -msse4.2" : " -msse4.2";
>> + const char *sse4_1 = has_sse4_1 ? " -msse4.1" : " -msse4.1";
>
> Missing "no-" here on both lines.
>
H
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:10:26AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> + const char *sse4_2 = has_sse4_2 ? " -msse4.2" : " -msse4.2";
> + const char *sse4_1 = has_sse4_1 ? " -msse4.1" : " -msse4.1";
Missing "no-" here on both lines.
Jakub
Hi,
We use processor model and family to detect processor. But some
processors may have some ISAs disabled. This patch always adds
-mno-XXX. OK for trunk and 4.6 if there are no regressions?
Thanks.
H.J.
---
2011-05-23 H.J. Lu
PR target/49128
* config/i386/driver-i386.c (h
