Re: PATCH: PR target/20020: 128 bit structs not targeted to TImode

2012-08-17 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:41 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > >> My email sent to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org was bounced as spam. I am >> resending it. This patch defines both MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE and >> MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK for i386. MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES

Re: PATCH: PR target/20020: 128 bit structs not targeted to TImode

2012-08-17 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:41 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > My email sent to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org was bounced as spam. I am > resending it. This patch defines both MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE and > MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK for i386. MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK is needed so > that we always put union with XFmode fie

PATCH: PR target/20020: 128 bit structs not targeted to TImode

2012-08-16 Thread H.J. Lu
Hi, My email sent to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org was bounced as spam. I am resending it. This patch defines both MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE and MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK for i386. MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK is needed so that we always put union with XFmode field in BLKmode. This patch doesn't change any ABI sin