On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 28/11/2012 20:11, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
> >> Here is the updated patch. OK for trunk?
> >
> > Looks good to me, though of course there are many parts I cannot
> > approve. Thanks!
> >
>
> Joseph, c
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 28/11/2012 20:11, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
>> Here is the updated patch. OK for trunk?
>
> Looks good to me, though of course there are many parts I cannot
> approve. Thanks!
>
Joseph, can you take a look at driver change?
Thanks.
--
H.J
Il 28/11/2012 20:11, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
> Here is the updated patch. OK for trunk?
Looks good to me, though of course there are many parts I cannot
approve. Thanks!
Paolo
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I cannot approve the collect2.c, gcc.c, opts.c, doc/invoke.texi. I'll
> include some comments anyway, since the patch needs some more work.
>
>> 2011-06-27 Doug Kwan
>>
>> Google ref 41164-p2
>> Backport upstream patch under
I cannot approve the collect2.c, gcc.c, opts.c, doc/invoke.texi. I'll
include some comments anyway, since the patch needs some more work.
> 2011-06-27 Doug Kwan
>
> Google ref 41164-p2
> Backport upstream patch under review.
>
> 2011-01-19 Nick Clifton
>
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:23 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 27/11/2012 17:07, H.J. Lu ha scritto:
>>> There is no reply for
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg02121.html
>>
>> That counts as lack of review...
>>
>
> That is no re
