Re: OpenMP Patch Ping – including "[13 Regression]" patches

2023-02-14 Thread Tobias Burnus
* The 'loop' patch fixes a long-standing bug exposed by a GCC 13 commit, making it a "13 Regression" fix * The next two are simple bug fixes, relatively obvious and have very limited-scope code changes - fixing wrong-code issues. * The next two are a bit longer but also rather contained. * Jul

OpenMP Patch Ping – including "[13 Regression]" patches

2023-02-07 Thread Tobias Burnus
Updated ping email as some patches have been reviewed. [Thanks! I still need to revised three of them: for Fortran, the parallel + loop issue and the non-rect-loop issue - and for C/C++, the allocate's align patch.] I think it would be very good to get (some of) Julian's mapping patches in as it

OpenMP Patch Ping – including "[13 Regression]" patches

2023-01-28 Thread Tobias Burnus
"[13 Regression]" OpenMP Fortran patches: [Patch] OpenMP/Fortran: Fix loop-iter var privatization with !$OMP LOOP [PR108512] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/610531.html [Patch][v2] OpenMP/Fortran: Partially fix non-rect loop nests [PR107424] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/

OpenMP Patch Ping

2023-01-10 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi all, hello Jakub, Below is the updated list to last ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/607178.html NOTE to the list below: I have stopped checking older patches. I know some more are pending review, others need to be revised. I will re-check, once the below listed p

OpenMP Patch Ping

2022-11-24 Thread Tobias Burnus
Updated list as follow up to last ping at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/601162.html Recent patches: Sandra's (Tue Nov 15 04:46:15 GMT 2022) [PATCH v4] OpenMP: Generate SIMD clones for functions with "declare target" https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-Nove

Re: OpenMP patch ping

2022-09-06 Thread Tobias Burnus
Follow-up patch ping (updated) The first listed patches are smaller + should be quicker to be reviewable, but in terms of priority, it would be good to make some progress on the larger patches below as well. Especially as the first patches are only mine ... Smaller patches (i) preparing for true

OpenMP patch ping

2022-08-16 Thread Tobias Burnus
I would like to ping the following OpenMP patches. First two non-pings but just RFC: - "Restore 'GOMP_offload_unregister_ver' functionality" https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-July/597918.html * QUESTION: See 'assert' question in email exchange (linked email message + emails b

Re: OpenMP patch ping ** 2

2020-12-03 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi, I would like to ping the following OpenMP-related patches: On 27.11.20 17:09, Tobias Burnus wrote: OpenMP-related patch pings: Kwok's: * Re: [PATCH] openmp: Implicit 'declare target' for C++ static initializers https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/559624.html * openmp:

OpenMP patch ping

2020-11-27 Thread Tobias Burnus
OpenMP-related patch pings: Kwok's: * Re: [PATCH] openmp: Implicit 'declare target' for C++ static initializers https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/559624.html * RFC: Nested declare target support https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/559758.html Chung

*OpenMP Patch Ping*

2019-10-28 Thread Tobias Burnus
* [Patch][OpenMP] use_device_addr/use_device_ptr with Fortran allocatable/pointer arrays (= array descriptor) https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg00985.html * [Patch][Fortran/OpenMP] Don't create "alloc:" for 'target exit data' https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01344.html