Hi Julian!
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 16:02:23 +, Julian Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 21:48:20 +0100
> Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > commit 3e3de40a5ab21d72f08071a7a40120dd05608cc1
> > Author: tschwinge
> > Date: Fri Nov 30 20:39:18 2018 +
> >
> >
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 21:48:20 +0100
Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> commit 3e3de40a5ab21d72f08071a7a40120dd05608cc1
> Author: tschwinge
> Date: Fri Nov 30 20:39:18 2018 +
>
> Clean up Fortran OpenACC wait clause handling
>
> "wait
Hi!
commit 3e3de40a5ab21d72f08071a7a40120dd05608cc1
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Nov 30 20:39:18 2018 +
Clean up Fortran OpenACC wait clause handling
"wait" can be deduced from "wait_list".
gcc/fortran/
* gfortran.h (struct gfc_
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 04:22:01PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> + while (ret == MATCH_YES)
> {
> - if (cp->gang_static)
> - return MATCH_ERROR;
> + if (gfc_match (" static :") == MATCH_YES)
> + {
> + if (cp->gang_static)
> + return M
On 06/27/2016 12:23 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:36:26AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> @@ -630,9 +653,10 @@ gfc_match_omp_clauses (gfc_omp_clauses **cp, uint64_t
>> mask,
>> {
>>gfc_omp_clauses *c = gfc_get_omp_clauses ();
>>locus old_loc;
>> + bool seen_er
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:36:26AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> With that aside, this patch should correct the issues you pointed out.
> gfc_match_omp_clauses now uses a common function to parse the gang,
> worker and vector clauses. Also, this patch takes extra care with
> MATCH_ERRORs when p
On 06/24/2016 08:53 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:42:49AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
@@ -1328,7 +1328,8 @@ gfc_match_omp_clauses (gfc_omp_clauses **cp,
uint64_t mask,
&& gfc_match ("wait") == MATCH_YES)
{
c->wait = true
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:42:49AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> >> @@ -1328,7 +1328,8 @@ gfc_match_omp_clauses (gfc_omp_clauses **cp,
> >> uint64_t mask,
> >> && gfc_match ("wait") == MATCH_YES)
> >>{
> >> c->wait = true;
> >> -match_oacc_expr_list (" (", &c-
On 06/17/2016 07:34 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 08:22:29PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> --- a/gcc/fortran/openmp.c
>> +++ b/gcc/fortran/openmp.c
>> @@ -677,7 +677,6 @@ gfc_match_omp_clauses (gfc_omp_clauses **cp, uint64_t
>> mask,
>>&& gfc_match ("async") =
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 08:22:29PM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> --- a/gcc/fortran/openmp.c
> +++ b/gcc/fortran/openmp.c
> @@ -677,7 +677,6 @@ gfc_match_omp_clauses (gfc_omp_clauses **cp, uint64_t
> mask,
> && gfc_match ("async") == MATCH_YES)
> {
> c->async =
On 06/07/2016 08:02 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:01:10AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> On 06/07/2016 04:13 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>>> I've noticed
>>> if ((mask & OMP_CLAUSE_WAIT)
>>> && !c->wait
>>> && gfc_match ("wait") == M
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:01:10AM -0700, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> On 06/07/2016 04:13 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > I've noticed
> > if ((mask & OMP_CLAUSE_WAIT)
> > && !c->wait
> > && gfc_match ("wait") == MATCH_YES)
> > {
> > c-
On 06/07/2016 04:13 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> I've noticed
> if ((mask & OMP_CLAUSE_WAIT)
> && !c->wait
> && gfc_match ("wait") == MATCH_YES)
> {
> c->wait = true;
> match_oacc_expr_list (" (", &c->wait_list, false);
>
Hi!
I've noticed
if ((mask & OMP_CLAUSE_WAIT)
&& !c->wait
&& gfc_match ("wait") == MATCH_YES)
{
c->wait = true;
match_oacc_expr_list (" (", &c->wait_list, false);
continue;
}
which looks just w
14 matches
Mail list logo
