Re: OpenACC atomic directive

2021-05-18 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2015-11-03T12:30:09+0100, I wrote: > On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:40:54 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 02:09:38PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> > The OpenACC atomic directive matches OpenMP's atomic directive (got that >> > clarified by

Re: OpenACC atomic directive

2015-11-03 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:40:54 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 02:09:38PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > The OpenACC atomic directive matches OpenMP's atomic directive (got that > > clarified by the OpenACC committee), so they can share the same >

Re: OpenACC atomic directive

2015-11-02 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 02:09:38PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > The OpenACC atomic directive matches OpenMP's atomic directive (got that > clarified by the OpenACC committee), so they can share the same > implementation. OK for trunk? Ok. Jakub

OpenACC atomic directive

2015-11-02 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! The OpenACC atomic directive matches OpenMP's atomic directive (got that clarified by the OpenACC committee), so they can share the same implementation. OK for trunk? commit 826c7022d0e2b9e225215b168a95487823dce925 Author: Thomas Schwinge Date: Mon Nov 2 10:35:44 2015 +0100 Op