Re: One more patch for PR91333

2020-02-23 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 2020-02-18 10:39 a.m., Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: On Feb 18, 2020, at 6:30 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: On 2/17/20 10:08 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: Hi Vladimir, This patch increases code size at -Os on arm-linux-gnueabihf by 1% (with no code-size reductions) on several SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks:

Re: One more patch for PR91333

2020-02-18 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
> On Feb 18, 2020, at 6:30 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > > On 2/17/20 10:08 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: >> Hi Vladimir, >> >> This patch increases code size at -Os on arm-linux-gnueabihf by 1% (with no >> code-size reductions) on several SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks: >> >> 400.perlbench,perlbench_bas

Re: One more patch for PR91333

2020-02-18 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 2/17/20 10:08 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: Hi Vladimir, This patch increases code size at -Os on arm-linux-gnueabihf by 1% (with no code-size reductions) on several SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks: 400.perlbench,perlbench_base.default ,580842,583842 429.mcf,mcf_base.default

Re: One more patch for PR91333

2020-02-17 Thread Maxim Kuvyrkov
Hi Vladimir, This patch increases code size at -Os on arm-linux-gnueabihf by 1% (with no code-size reductions) on several SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks: 400.perlbench,perlbench_base.default ,580842,583842 429.mcf,mcf_base.default ,7867,7955 4

One more patch for PR91333

2020-02-02 Thread Vladimir Makarov
  The previous patch for https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91333 resulted in aarch64 testsuite failures. The following patch solves some of the failures and modified the PR test as the generated code changed. The patch was successfully bootstrapped on x86-64 and benchmarked on SP