On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 05:20:24PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> >>PR tree-optimization/53805
> >>* fold-const.c (invert_tree_comparison): Do invert ORDERED_EXPR and
> >>UNORDERED_EXPR for floating point.
> >
> >Minor protest about the ChangeLog:
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, Nathan Froyd wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 02:48:08PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
I am redoing the bootstrap+regtest, then I'll commit if I don't hear
protests about the testcase.
gcc/ChangeLog
2012-06-15 Marc Glisse
PR tree-optimization/53805
* fold-cons
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 02:48:08PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
> I am redoing the bootstrap+regtest, then I'll commit if I don't hear
> protests about the testcase.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog
> 2012-06-15 Marc Glisse
>
> PR tree-optimization/53805
> * fold-const.c (invert_tree_comparison): Do
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> an opinion on this?
>>>
>>> (I just noticed: I'll update the list in the comment visible at the top
>>> of
>>> the patch
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
an opinion on this?
(I just noticed: I'll update the list in the comment visible at the top of
the patch if this gets in).
It looks ok to me but I am no floating-point expert. Can you add
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> an opinion on this?
>
> (I just noticed: I'll update the list in the comment visible at the top of
> the patch if this gets in).
It looks ok to me but I am no floating-point expert. Can you add a testcase?
Ok with that change.
Tha
Hello,
an opinion on this?
(I just noticed: I'll update the list in the comment visible at the top of
the patch if this gets in).
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
the simple patch below passes the testsuite after a c,c++ bootstrap without
new regressions. Note however that
Hello,
the simple patch below passes the testsuite after a c,c++ bootstrap
without new regressions. Note however that
#include
int f(double a, double b){
return (!isunordered(a,b))&&(ais then optimized by ifcombine to "return (athe absence of -fno-trapping-math. I don't know if there are wa
