Cc: libstd...@gcc.gnu.org <mailto:libstdc%2b...@gcc.gnu.org>; GCC
Patches
> Subject: Re: ODR violation in ranges
>
> On 11/03/20 06:08 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>> Jonathan,
>> the ranges header contains code like:
>> inli
o (i); }
>
> compile with -fno-inline and observe '_ZNKUliE_clEi'
>
> sigh,
>
> nathan
> >
> >
> > From: Libstdc++ on behalf of Jonathan
> Wakely via Libstdc++
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 10:26
> > To: Nathan Sidwell
>
#x27;_ZNKUliE_clEi'
sigh,
nathan
From: Libstdc++ on behalf of Jonathan Wakely via
Libstdc++
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 10:26
To: Nathan Sidwell
Cc: libstd...@gcc.gnu.org; GCC Patches
Subject: Re: ODR violation in ranges
On 11/03/20 06:
> From: Libstdc++ on behalf of Jonathan Wakely
> via Libstdc++
> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 10:26
> To: Nathan Sidwell
> Cc: libstd...@gcc.gnu.org; GCC Patches
> Subject: Re: ODR violation in ranges
>
> On 11/03/20 06:08 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> >Jona
On 11/03/20 10:56 +, Tam S. B. via Libstdc++ wrote:
IIUC using lambda in inline variable initializer is not ODR violation. This is
covered in CWG 2300 (
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p1510r0.html#2300 ).
Ah yes, I think somebody (probably Patrick) has pointed out
On 11/03/20 06:08 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Jonathan,
the ranges header contains code like:
inline constexpr __adaptor::_RangeAdaptorClosure all
= [] (_Range&& __r)
{
if constexpr (view>)
return std::forward<_Range>(__r);
else if constexpr (requires { ref_view{std::forward<_Ran
Jonathan,
the ranges header contains code like:
inline constexpr __adaptor::_RangeAdaptorClosure all
= [] (_Range&& __r)
{
if constexpr (view>)
return std::forward<_Range>(__r);
else if constexpr (requires { ref_view{std::forward<_Range>(__r)}; })
return ref_view{std::forw
