On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 6:48 PM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:50 AM Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Steve Ellcey writes:
> >> > Richard,
> >> >
> >> > I don't necessarily disagree with anything in your comments and long
> >> > term I t
Richard Biener writes:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:50 AM Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Steve Ellcey writes:
>> > Richard,
>> >
>> > I don't necessarily disagree with anything in your comments and long
>> > term I think that is the right direction, but I wonder if that level of
>> > change is
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:50 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Steve Ellcey writes:
> > Richard,
> >
> > I don't necessarily disagree with anything in your comments and long
> > term I think that is the right direction, but I wonder if that level of
> > change is appropriate for GCC Stage 4 which
Ping
Richard Sandiford writes:
> Steve Ellcey writes:
>> Richard,
>>
>> I don't necessarily disagree with anything in your comments and long
>> term I think that is the right direction, but I wonder if that level of
>> change is appropriate for GCC Stage 4 which is where we are now. Your
>> cha
Steve Ellcey writes:
> Richard,
>
> I don't necessarily disagree with anything in your comments and long
> term I think that is the right direction, but I wonder if that level of
> change is appropriate for GCC Stage 4 which is where we are now. Your
> changes would require fixes in shared code,
