On 09/25/15 09:19, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 09/25/2015 03:03 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
182 else if (acc_device_type (acc_dev->type) == acc_device_host)
(gdb) p acc_dev->type
$1 = OFFLOAD_TARGET_TYPE_HOST
(gdb) next
184 fn (hostaddrs);
It's not running the offloaded version, so the t
On 09/25/2015 03:03 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
182 else if (acc_device_type (acc_dev->type) == acc_device_host)
(gdb) p acc_dev->type
$1 = OFFLOAD_TARGET_TYPE_HOST
(gdb) next
184 fn (hostaddrs);
It's not running the offloaded version, so the testcase I think should
fail.
... and th
On 09/25/2015 02:30 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
(gdb) p result
$1 =
(gdb) pge
warning: Expression is not an assignment (and might have no effect)
2 == 4 || 2 == 5
I'm not really sure about the logic, but are the results maybe switched
(returning false on the device and true on the host)?
Eh, no
On 09/25/2015 12:56 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 09/25/15 06:28, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Can you send me the patch you tried (and possibly a testcase you
expect to be
handled), I'll see if I can find out what's going on.
Thanks! When things didn't work, I tried getting it workong on the
gomp4 br
On 09/25/15 06:28, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
This is the c-c++-common/goacc/acc_on_device-2.c testcase. Is that expected to
be handled? If I change it to use __builtin_acc_on_device, I can step right into
Breakpoint 8, fold_call_stmt (stmt=0x70736e10, ignore=false) at
../../git/gcc/builtins.c:1
On 09/25/2015 12:38 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 09/23/15 14:58, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 09/23/15 14:51, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 09/23/2015 08:42 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
We have to defer folding until we know whether we're doing host or
device compilation.
Doesn't something like "symtab->
On 09/23/15 14:58, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 09/23/15 14:51, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 09/23/2015 08:42 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
As I feared, builtin folding occurs in several places. In particular
its first call is very early on in the host compiler, which is far too
soon.
We have to defer fo
On 09/23/15 14:51, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 09/23/2015 08:42 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
As I feared, builtin folding occurs in several places. In particular
its first call is very early on in the host compiler, which is far too
soon.
We have to defer folding until we know whether we're doing ho
On 09/23/2015 08:42 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
As I feared, builtin folding occurs in several places. In particular
its first call is very early on in the host compiler, which is far too
soon.
We have to defer folding until we know whether we're doing host or
device compilation.
Doesn't somet
On 09/23/15 08:58, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 09/23/2015 02:14 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 09/23/15 06:59, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 09/22/2015 05:16 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
+if (gimple_call_builtin_p (call, BUILT_IN_ACC_ON_DEVICE))
+ /* acc_on_device must be evaluated at compile time f
On 09/23/2015 02:14 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 09/23/15 06:59, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 09/22/2015 05:16 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
+if (gimple_call_builtin_p (call, BUILT_IN_ACC_ON_DEVICE))
+ /* acc_on_device must be evaluated at compile time for
+ constant arguments. */
+
On 09/23/15 06:59, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 09/22/2015 05:16 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
+if (gimple_call_builtin_p (call, BUILT_IN_ACC_ON_DEVICE))
+ /* acc_on_device must be evaluated at compile time for
+ constant arguments. */
+ {
+oacc_xform_on_device (call);
+
On 09/22/2015 05:16 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
+ if (gimple_call_builtin_p (call, BUILT_IN_ACC_ON_DEVICE))
+ /* acc_on_device must be evaluated at compile time for
+constant arguments. */
+ {
+ oacc_xform_on_device (call);
+ rescan = true;
+
On 09/21/15 16:39, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 09/21/15 16:30, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
On 09/21/2015 09:30 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
+const pass_data pass_data_oacc_transform =
+{
+ GIMPLE_PASS, /* type */
+ "fold_oacc_transform", /* name */
Want to rename the tree dump file to oacc_xforms l
On 09/21/15 16:30, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
On 09/21/2015 09:30 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
+const pass_data pass_data_oacc_transform =
+{
+ GIMPLE_PASS, /* type */
+ "fold_oacc_transform", /* name */
Want to rename the tree dump file to oacc_xforms like I'm did in the
attached patch? Regardl
On 09/21/2015 09:30 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> +const pass_data pass_data_oacc_transform =
> +{
> + GIMPLE_PASS, /* type */
> + "fold_oacc_transform", /* name */
Want to rename the tree dump file to oacc_xforms like I'm did in the
attached patch? Regardless, I think we need to document this fl
Jakub,
this patch adds a new transforming pass, which executes after the LTO readback
pass, and hence knows whether it is targeting the host or (a) device.
The contents of the pass will be built out -- it does much more on the gomp4
pass. This instance simply scans and replaces the acc_on_dev
17 matches
Mail list logo
