Hi!
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 21:04:21 +0100, I wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:16:08 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:10:19AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/gomp/nesting-1.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> > > +void
> > > +f_om
Hi!
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:16:08 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:10:19AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/gomp/nesting-1.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> > +void
> > +f_omp_parallel (void)
> > +{
> > +#pragma omp parallel
> > + {
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:10:19AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/gomp/nesting-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> +void
> +f_omp_parallel (void)
> +{
> +#pragma omp parallel
> + {
> +int i;
Can you please use a global variable declared outside of
f_omp_pa
Hi Jakub!
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:02:24 +0100, I wrote:
> OpenACC: Rework nested constructs checking.
>
> gcc/
> * omp-low.c (scan_omp_target): Remove taskreg_nesting_level and
> target_nesting_level assertions.
> (check_omp_nesting_restrictions): Rework OpenACC con
ps at runtime, supporting #pragma omp directives inside of OpenACC
> regions not needed (perhaps there are exceptions you want to support?).
We have not yet tested such nested OpenACC/OpenMP constructs (one thing
after the other), so I'm not confident to claim support for that, and
earlier on
