> On 07/15/2014 11:29 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >Yep, you are right. I was looking into this, too. I think dump_ada_template
> >should be moved into C++ FE somehow because it deals with C++ trees.
> >What would be most appropriate way to do so?
>
> I suppose we could pass a pointer to it into dump
On 07/15/2014 11:29 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Yep, you are right. I was looking into this, too. I think dump_ada_template
should be moved into C++ FE somehow because it deals with C++ trees.
What would be most appropriate way to do so?
I suppose we could pass a pointer to it into dump_ada_specs l
> On 07/15/2014 10:19 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >@@ -1722,7 +1722,7 @@ dump_ada_template (pretty_printer *buffe
> >/* DECL_VINDEX is DECL_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATIONS in this context. */
> >tree inst = DECL_VINDEX (t);
> >/* DECL_RESULT_FLD is DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT in this context. */
> >-
On 07/15/2014 10:19 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
@@ -1722,7 +1722,7 @@ dump_ada_template (pretty_printer *buffe
/* DECL_VINDEX is DECL_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATIONS in this context. */
tree inst = DECL_VINDEX (t);
/* DECL_RESULT_FLD is DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT in this context. */
- tree result = D
Hi,
this patch continues by moving DECL_RESULT into FUNCTION_DECL.
tree_decl_non_common
becomes empty, but I decided to get rid of it in an followup patch - it needs
more
changes and doing it all at once would be bit convoluted.
Bootstrappred/regtested x86_64-linux, OK?
Honza
* tree-co
