Hi,
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > This patch exposes a problem in libada. But I'd still be interested
> > if it fixes the spu problem.
>
> It turns out that the patch not only fixes the pr49771 failure, but in
> fact *all* outstanding vectorizer test case failures on SPU in bo
Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Well, REG_ATTRS->decl is again a decl, not an SSA name. I suppose
> > > > > we'd need to p
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Michael Matz wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
>> > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>> >
>> > > > Well, REG_ATTRS->decl is again a decl, not an SSA name. I suppose
>> > > > we'd need to pick a conservative REGNO_
Michael Matz wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> >
> > > > Well, REG_ATTRS->decl is again a decl, not an SSA name. I suppose
> > > > we'd need to pick a conservative REGNO_POINTER_ALIGN during
> > > > expansion of the SSA name partiti
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> >
> > > > Well, REG_ATTRS->decl is again a decl, not an SSA name. I suppose
> > > > we'd need to pick a conservative REGNO_POINTER_ALIGN durin
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
>
> > > Well, REG_ATTRS->decl is again a decl, not an SSA name. I suppose
> > > we'd need to pick a conservative REGNO_POINTER_ALIGN during
> > > expansion of the SSA name partition - iterate over all
