On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
>> Ping
>
> Oh, sure. I had somehow thought this had been applied already.
>
> Instead of just removing ix86/avx, would you mind moving it to
> the "Inactive Development Branches" section?
I am app
Agreed, but I have no idea, how to work with wwwdocs at all.
H.J., could you please move ix86/avx to "inactive" section?
Thanks, K
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
>> Ping
>
> Oh, sure. I had somehow thought this had been applie
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Ping
Oh, sure. I had somehow thought this had been applied already.
Instead of just removing ix86/avx, would you mind moving it to
the "Inactive Development Branches" section?
Gerald
Ping
--
Thanks, K
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:43 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch removes ix86/avx branch and mentions avx2 branch. OK
> to install?
>
>
> H.J.
>
> Index: svn.html
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs
Hi,
This patch removes ix86/avx branch and mentions avx2 branch. OK
to install?
H.J.
Index: svn.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/svn.html,v
retrieving revision 1.162
diff -u -p -r1.162 svn.html
--- svn.html3 Jun