Christophe Lyon writes:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 11:41, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Richard Biener writes:
>> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 4:33 PM Richard Sandiford
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> assemble_real used GEN_INT to create integers directly from the
>> >> longs returned by real_to_target.
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 11:41, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 4:33 PM Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> assemble_real used GEN_INT to create integers directly from the
> >> longs returned by real_to_target. assemble_integer then went on
> >>
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:41 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 4:33 PM Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> assemble_real used GEN_INT to create integers directly from the
> >> longs returned by real_to_target. assemble_integer then went on
>
Richard Biener writes:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 4:33 PM Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> assemble_real used GEN_INT to create integers directly from the
>> longs returned by real_to_target. assemble_integer then went on
>> to interpret the const_ints as though they had the mode corresponding
>>
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 4:33 PM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> assemble_real used GEN_INT to create integers directly from the
> longs returned by real_to_target. assemble_integer then went on
> to interpret the const_ints as though they had the mode corresponding
> to the accompanying size paramet
assemble_real used GEN_INT to create integers directly from the
longs returned by real_to_target. assemble_integer then went on
to interpret the const_ints as though they had the mode corresponding
to the accompanying size parameter:
imode = mode_for_size (size * BITS_PER_UNIT, mclass, 0).r
