On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 18:58 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> I agree with David. This is really the same kind of situation as we
> already have for -m(no-)dsp, etc. There too we need to override an
> explicit -mdsp (which might be added using --target_board, etc.)
> when testing a target that d
Steve Ellcey writes:
> On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 18:24 -0700, David Daney wrote:
>
>> > This patch addes the -mno-synci flag to MIPS tests that specify an
>> > architecture that does not support synci, thus getting rid of the
>> > warning message and making the tests pass. Tested with the mips-linux-
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 18:24 -0700, David Daney wrote:
> > This patch addes the -mno-synci flag to MIPS tests that specify an
> > architecture that does not support synci, thus getting rid of the
> > warning message and making the tests pass. Tested with the mips-linux-gnu
> > and mips-sde-elf tar
On 06/11/2012 12:30 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
This patch is to fix MIPS failures that occcur when configuring GCC with the
-with-synci option. In this case GCC will generate the synci instruction
by default if on a MIPS architecture that supports it . When on an
architecture that does not support
This patch is to fix MIPS failures that occcur when configuring GCC with the
-with-synci option. In this case GCC will generate the synci instruction
by default if on a MIPS architecture that supports it . When on an
architecture that does not support synci, GCC will not generate it by default
bu
